Learn More About Human Evolution and God’s WordĪt Answers TV, you get plenty of educational videos that equip you with biblical truth to understand our world and how God created humans and apes as separate kinds. That depiction isn’t scientific fact-it’s an evolutionist’s interpretation. Remember these points next time you see Lucy drawn as an ape-like human. On Day Six of Creation, God created humans and apes as two separate creatures-with plenty of genetic diversity within their respective kinds. Not only does scientific evidence lean toward this conclusion, but the Word of God also tells us that God created each creature according to its kind. So Who’s Lucy?ĭespite what evolutionists say and how they imagine Lucy in drawings, this incredible creature was likely a small gorilla or maybe a chimpanzee-but certainly not a missing link or an evolutionary ancestor to humans. What do these findings indicate? That Lucy didn’t spend all her time walking like a human but rather most likely lived in trees. Wrists that resemble those of apes that walk on their knuckles.Shoulders that curve upward almost exactly like great apes alive today.Curved toes like those of tree-dwelling apes.And since they had discovered Lucy in 1974 in Ethiopia, they quickly assumed her species left those footprints-or at least had hands and feet like a human.īut since those discoveries, more bones and fragments from Lucy’s species have been found: Instead of re-examining their dating methods and timelines, evolutionists assume these footprints belonged to ape-like human ancestors.
In fact, the only reason evolutionists don’t think they belonged to humans is that they’re too old. So what does this tell us about Lucy? That she was most likely a chimpanzee, not a human-ape hybrid! Did Lucy Walk Like Us?Įvolutionists also believe Lucy walked like a human because of fossilized footprints found at Laetoli in Tanzania in 19, which look just like human footprints. Humans, as you know, aren’t known to live in trees like apes. And in the plains of Africa, where she was found, trees are one of the only tall objects she could’ve fallen from. Instead, they appeared to be the result of a fall. After all, her bones didn’t appear to be trampled or crushed. Their conclusion? She likely died from falling out of a tree. And if she spent so much time walking, then she had to be connected to humans! Right?Ī team of researchers in Texas used high-resolution CT scans to analyze Lucy’s skeleton.
After all, the skeleton is in fragments, meaning it’s hard to tell just how long her limbs were and what her full skeleton looked like.īecause of that, scientists focus on another aspect to answer the debate: How much time did Lucy spend in trees? Evolutionists believe that the shape of Lucy’s big toe indicates she most likely walked upright on two feet. Looking at the skeleton alone, the answer isn’t so cut and dry. Is Lucy a missing link between humans and apes? Or is she actually just a different kind of ape? For over 45 years, the skeleton dubbed Lucy has been a topic of hot debate among evolutionists and creationists.